Here's what the science shows
Both walking lunges and Bulgarian split squats are highly effective single-leg exercises, but they activate muscles differently. Research shows that dynamic lunge variations elicit greater gluteus maximus activation than static lunges : with walking lunges producing ~58% MVIC glute activation. The Bulgarian split squat (BSS) emphasises hip extension more than knee extension compared to other squat variations, and trunk flexion during BSS significantly increases activation of the gluteus maximus and biceps femoris. For knee safety, all lunge variations appear appropriate and safe during ACL rehabilitation because of minimal ACL loading. The takeaway: walking lunges for dynamic glute activation and balance; Bulgarian split squats for isolated hip extension strength and posterior chain emphasis. Use both for complete single-leg development.
Short answer
Both walking lunges and Bulgarian split squats are highly effective single-leg exercises, but they serve different purposes. Walking lunges are dynamic and produce greater gluteus maximus activation (up to 58% MVIC) and, with contralateral loading, exceptional gluteus medius activation (90% MVIC). They are superior for balance, coordination, and dynamic stabilisation. The Bulgarian split squat (BSS) is static, emphasises hip extension more than knee extension, and allows for heavier loading. With trunk flexion, it significantly increases glute and hamstring activation. For knee safety, both have minimal ACL loading. The best approach: use both : walking lunges for dynamic glute activation and balance, and BSS for heavy hip extension strength and posterior chain development.
Research source disclaimer. All research cited in this article is sourced from peer-reviewed studies indexed in PubMed, NIH/NCBI-linked sources, or reputable journals where available. Links to the original studies are provided throughout.
Introduction
Single-leg training has become a cornerstone of modern strength and conditioning. It builds muscle, improves balance, corrects imbalances and transfers better to sport than bilateral exercises.
But when it comes to choosing a single-leg exercise, two movements dominate the conversation: the walking lunge and the Bulgarian split squat.
Both are effective. Both challenge your balance. Both build lower body strength. But they are not interchangeable. One is dynamic and movement-based; the other is static and position-based. One challenges coordination and stability; the other allows you to load heavier with more stability.
So which one should you choose? The answer depends on your goals, your injury history and how you structure your training.
This guide breaks down what the peer-reviewed research actually says about walking lunges and Bulgarian split squats : for muscle activation, balance, knee safety and practical application.
Anatomy / Biomechanics: What Changes?
The Primary Muscles
| Muscle | Role in Walking Lunge | Role in Bulgarian Split Squat |
|---|---|---|
| Quadriceps (vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, rectus femoris) | Knee extension : driving forward and up | Knee extension : primary mover |
| Gluteus maximus | Hip extension : driving forward | Hip extension : emphasised (more than knee extension) |
| Gluteus medius | Hip stabilisation : critical for balance | Hip stabilisation : highly active |
| Hamstrings (biceps femoris) | Hip extension assistance; knee stabilisation | Posterior chain support |
| Erector spinae | Core stabilisation | Trunk stabilisation |
| Ankle stabilisers (tibialis anterior, peroneus longus) | Balance and control | Balance and control : significantly higher activation in BSS |
Key Biomechanical Differences
| Feature | Walking Lunge | Bulgarian Split Squat |
|---|---|---|
| Movement pattern | Dynamic : forward step + return | Static : vertical squat with rear foot elevated |
| Base of support | Changing (step to step) | Fixed (front leg stable) |
| Balance demand | High : dynamic stabilisation | Moderate : static stabilisation |
| Hip extension emphasis | Moderate | High : emphasises hip extension more than knee extension |
| Knee flexion | Significant (front knee ~90°) | Significant (front knee ~90°) |
| Rear leg involvement | Minimal (push-off) | Significant : contributes resistance against hip extension |
| Load capacity | Moderate (limited by balance) | High (more stable position) |
The walking lunge is a dynamic, movement-based exercise that challenges coordination and balance. The Bulgarian split squat is a static, position-based exercise that allows greater loading and emphasises hip extension.

The Science: What the Research Reveals
Dynamic lunge variations (walking lunges) elicit significantly greater gluteus maximus activation (~58% MVIC) compared to static lunges.
Contralateral walking lunges highly activate the gluteus medius (90% MVIC), making them exceptional for hip stability.
BSS emphasises hip extension more than knee extension. The rear leg contributes up to 97% of total resistance against hip extension.
Trunk flexion during BSS significantly increases activation of the gluteus maximus and biceps femoris.
Source 1: Muscle Activation : Walking Lunge Activates Glutes More Than Static Lunges
Study: Bezerra EDS, et al. Influence of Trunk Position during Three Lunge Exercises on Muscular Activation in Trained Women. Int J Exerc Sci. 2021;14(1):202-210.
PubMed ID: 34055138
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34055138/
What it found: Twelve trained women performed lunges with 30% bodyweight load. Gluteus maximus activation was significantly higher during walking lunges compared to static lunges:
| Exercise | Gluteus Maximus (%MVIC) |
|---|---|
| Static lunge | 31 ± 12% |
| Step-forward lunge | 54 ± 20% |
| Walking lunge | 58 ± 30% |
The study also found that walking lunges produced greater erector spinae activation (40 ± 33% vs 24 ± 16% for static). "Dynamic lunge variations elicit greater muscular activation in the gluteus maximus than static lunges."
Key takeaway: If your goal is maximising glute activation, the walking lunge is superior to static variations. The dynamic nature of the movement requires more muscle recruitment.
Source 2: Muscle Activation : Contralateral Walking Lunge Highly Activates Gluteus Medius
Study: Stastny P, et al. Does the Dumbbell-Carrying Position Change the Muscle Activity in Split Squats and Walking Lunges? J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(11):3177-3187.
PubMed ID: 25968228
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25968228/
What it found: Resistance-trained and non-resistance-trained participants performed walking lunges and split squats with different dumbbell-carrying positions.
| Finding | Detail |
|---|---|
| Contralateral walking lunges | Highly activated the gluteus medius (90% MVIC) |
| Ipsilateral loading | Did not increase gluteus medius or vastus medialis activity |
| Resistance-trained group | Showed higher eccentric gluteus medius amplitude (p < 0.001) during all exercises |
"Contralateral WLs highly activated the Gmed (90% MVIC); therefore, this exercise can increase the Gmed maximal strength."
Key takeaway: For gluteus medius development (critical for hip stability and injury prevention), the walking lunge with contralateral loading (dumbbell in the opposite hand to the front leg) is exceptionally effective.
Source 3: Bulgarian Split Squat : Hip Extension Emphasis
Study: Arakawa H, et al. Rear Leg-derived Moment Contributes to Resistance Against Hip Extension in Bulgarian Split Squats. Int J Exerc Sci. 2025;18(7):881-894.
PubMed ID: 40909869
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40909869/
What it found: Nine trained males performed bodyweight Bulgarian split squats under different stance and trunk conditions. Key findings:
| Finding | Detail |
|---|---|
| Hip extension emphasis | BSS emphasises hip extension more than knee extension |
| Rear leg moment | The rear leg contributes 70-97% (wide stance) and 62-98% (narrow stance) of total resistance against hip extension |
| Stance width | Wide stance increased rear leg moment to 76-86 Nm vs 49-71 Nm in narrow stance |
| Upright trunk | In narrow stance, MRL increased significantly as trunk became more upright |
Key takeaway: The Bulgarian split squat is uniquely effective for targeting the hip extensors (glutes and hamstrings). The rear leg contributes significant resistance, making it a powerful exercise for posterior chain development.
Source 4: Bulgarian Split Squat : Trunk Position and Muscle Activation
Study: Targeted muscle activation in Bulgarian split squat variations: effects of trunk position and suspension-based execution. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025;17:251.
URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13102-025-01306-z
What it found: Twenty-one trained female athletes performed four BSS variations. Key findings:
| Condition | Effect |
|---|---|
| Trunk flexion | Significantly increased gluteus maximus (p = 0.024) and biceps femoris (p = 0.015) activation |
| Suspension-based BSS | Significantly increased erector spinae activation (p = 0.046) |
| Posterior chain | Trunk flexion enhanced posterior chain muscle activation |
"Trunk flexion increases activation in the GMax, BF, and RF muscles (p < 0.05)."
Key takeaway: To maximise glute and hamstring activation during the Bulgarian split squat, lean your trunk forward. To target core stabilisers, use suspension-based variations.
Source 5: Knee Safety : All Lunge Variations Are ACL-Safe
Study: Cruciate ligament forces between short-step and long-step forward lunge.
URL: PubMed
What it found: This study compared cruciate ligament forces between different lunge variations. "All lunge variations appear appropriate and safe during ACL rehabilitation because of minimal ACL loading." ACL forces were only generated in the forward lunge short with stride (0-50 N range between 0° and 10° knee flexion angles).
Key takeaway: Both walking lunges and Bulgarian split squats are safe for the ACL when performed with proper technique. This makes them excellent choices for knee rehabilitation and injury prevention.
Source 6: Step Length : Longer Steps Increase Hip Extensor Activation
Study: Effects of step lengths on biomechanical characteristics of lower extremity during split squat movement. 2023.
URL: PubMed
What it found: Increases in step length during split squat movements had a greater activation on hip extensor muscles while having a limited impact on knee extensor muscles.
Key takeaway: For the Bulgarian split squat, using a longer step length shifts emphasis toward the glutes and hamstrings, while a shorter step length emphasises the quadriceps.
Source 7: Ankle Stability : BSS Activates Ankle Stabilisers More
Study: Comparison of Activities of Tibialis Anterior, Peroneus Longus, and Tibialis Posterior Muscles according to Lunge Squats and Bulgarian Split Squats. J Musculoskelet Sci Technol. 2017.
URL: KCI
What it found: During the Bulgarian split squat, EMG activities of the tibialis anterior and peroneus longus were significantly higher than during the lunge squat. These muscles are critical for ankle stability.
Key takeaway: The Bulgarian split squat is superior for developing ankle stability and strengthening the muscles that protect the ankle joint.
Practical Application
Step-by-Step Instructions
Walking Lunge
- Stand tall with feet hip-width apart, dumbbells at your sides or a barbell on your back.
- Step forward with one leg : take a long enough step so your front knee stays behind your toes.
